Otterly.AI review: the dashboard, the real price, and who it's for
Otterly is the cheapest credible way to monitor your brand in AI answers, starting at $29 a month. This review explains every view in its dashboard, what you actually pay once you add Gemini, AI Mode or Claude, and what 15 tracked prompts can and can't tell you.
- By AI Visibility Checker Pro
- Updated
- 14 min read
On this page
The short version
- What it is: a monitoring tool that runs a fixed set of prompts through AI engines every day and reports how often your brand is named, where it ranks, how it's described, and which sites get cited.
- Price: $29/month (Lite, 15 prompts) to $489/month (Premium, 400 prompts), or about 15% less billed annually. Gemini, Google AI Mode and Claude cost extra on every plan.
- Cadence: daily, for every engine. You can't change it.
- Best for: small marketing teams and agencies that already know which buyer questions matter and want a cheap, steady trend line.
- Not ideal for: founders who haven't confirmed that AI mentions them at all, or teams that need Gemini and Claude on a tight budget.
- Our verdict: good value for focused monitoring. Check where you stand for free first, then pick the plan and add-ons that match the engines your buyers actually use.
Disclosure: we make a free AI visibility checker and are building a weekly tracker, so we have an interest in this category. We've kept this review to facts you can check on Otterly's own pricing page and help center, verified on October 13, 2026. Not to be confused with Otter.ai, the meeting-notes app.
What Otterly.AI is
Otterly.AI is an AI search monitoring tool from Austria. It was founded in 2024 by Thomas Peham, Josef Trauner (who previously founded Usersnap) and Klaus-M. Schremser. It launched AI search monitoring in October 2024 and says it now serves more than 40,000 marketing professionals. Gartner named it a Cool Vendor in AI in Marketing in 2025. Third-party reviews describe it as self-funded with a small team.
The idea is simple. You give Otterly a list of prompts, the questions your buyers might type into ChatGPT or Perplexity. Every day it asks those prompts on each engine you pay for, saves the answers, and turns them into dashboards: how often you're mentioned, your position in list-style answers, the tone, and the websites the engines cite.
That's monitoring. Otterly also has a GEO audit, recommendations and AI crawler analytics, but it's a measurement tool first. It tells you where you stand. The fixing, such as better pages and getting mentioned on the sites AI cites, is still your job. Our guide to generative engine optimization covers that side.
The Otterly dashboard, view by view
Most reviews show a screenshot or two. Here's what each part of the dashboard measures, using the formulas Otterly publishes in its help center, and how to act on it.
Brand Report overview
The home view for each brand. It charts your coverage over time against your top five competitors (or all of them), plus share of voice, average position and sentiment. Since October 2026 you can add annotations, which is useful for marking when you shipped a page or landed a mention, and filter for brands trending up or down.
Brand Coverage
The headline number: prompts that mention your brand ÷ all prompts in the time window. One detail matters. For Google AI Overviews, prompts where Google showed no AI Overview are left out of the calculation, so the denominator can shrink without you noticing.
Share of Voice
Your brand mentions ÷ all brand mentions × 100. It shows how much of the conversation you own compared with the brands that appear alongside you. The catch is that share of voice depends on which competitors show up in your prompt set. Change the prompts and the number moves even if nothing changed in the market.
Average Brand Position and Brand Ranking
Average position is the mean of your position in list-style answers, counting only the answers where you appear. Lower is better. Brand Ranking is a leaderboard of every brand in your answers, sortable by coverage, position, sentiment or share of voice.
Net Sentiment Score
(positive − negative) ÷ total mentions × 100, on a scale from −100 to +100. It's been available on every plan since March 2026, with competitor benchmarking. Some users report it's oversensitive, so read the actual answers before reacting to a dip.
Brand Visibility Index
A quadrant chart of the top 10 brands: Leaders, Niche, Low Conversion and Low Performance. The horizontal axis is coverage. The vertical axis is labelled "Likelihood to Buy", but by Otterly's own formula it's a rescaling of average position (10 + ((5 − position) ÷ 4) × 90). It measures how high you're listed, not purchase intent.
Prompts and Prompt Detail
The most useful screen. For each prompt you see coverage and sentiment per engine, the full AI answer, the citations, and a raw export as CSV or JSON. Reading the answers tells you why you're missing, which a score can't.
Citations and domain reports
Domain Coverage shows how often engines cite your site. Domain Sources ranks every cited domain, with category labels such as News/Media, Competitor and Blogs (you can't edit the labels). Link Citations lists the exact URLs, and a Winners & Losers view shows which pages gained or lost citations. This is where your outreach list comes from: the sites AI cites in your category are the sites worth being mentioned on.
GEO Audit
Checks whether about 20 AI crawlers can reach your pages, whether your content renders without JavaScript, and your structured data. Since June 2026 it includes Query Fan-Out, which shows the background searches ChatGPT and Google's AI run for a prompt. You can add those as tracked prompts.
Recommendations
Suggested actions based on the sources, competitors and brands in your answers. Lite gets three a week. Higher plans get unlimited. They need a few days of data first.
Agent Analytics
Launched in August 2026 and available on Standard and above. It reads your server logs, through Cloudflare, WordPress, Netlify, a webhook or a file upload, and shows which AI bots visit your site, which pages they fetch, and whether they're search crawlers, on-demand fetchers or training scrapers.
Filters, exports and roles
Tag prompts (branded, non-branded, top or bottom of funnel, or your own tags) and filter by tag, country and date range. Export CSVs or a PDF brand report, and add read-only Viewer seats. Team members are unlimited on every plan.
| View | Question it answers | What to do with it |
|---|---|---|
| Brand Coverage | How often am I named? | Track the trend, not single days |
| Share of Voice | Am I gaining on competitors? | Keep the prompt set stable so it's comparable |
| Avg. position | When named, am I the first pick? | Strengthen comparison and "best X for Y" coverage |
| Sentiment | How am I described? | Read the answers; fix outdated positioning |
| Citations / domains | Which pages shape the answer? | Pitch, list on or update those sources |
| GEO Audit | Can AI crawlers read my site? | Fix blocked bots and JS-only content |
| Agent Analytics | Which AI bots visit, and where? | Check your key pages are being fetched |
If you want a plain-English primer on these metrics first, read what AI search visibility is.
Otterly.AI pricing in 2026
Prices from otterly.ai/pricing on October 13, 2026, in US dollars.
| Plan | Monthly | Billed annually (per month) | Tracked prompts | Notable limits |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lite | $29 | $25 | 15 | 1 workspace, 3 recommendations a week, can't buy extra prompts |
| Standard | $189 | $160 | 100 | Unlimited workspaces, API and MCP, Looker Studio, Agent Analytics |
| Premium | $489 | $422 | 400 | Higher API and audit limits, personal onboarding |
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom | 1,000+ | SSO, dedicated success manager, custom terms |
Extra prompts cost $99 a month per 100, on Standard and Premium only. Every plan includes unlimited team members and brand reports, the prompt research tool, citation reports and GEO audits.
Engines: what's included and what costs extra
ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity and Microsoft Copilot are included on every plan. Three engines are paid add-ons, priced by plan:
| Add-on engine | Lite | Standard | Premium |
|---|---|---|---|
| Google AI Mode | $9/mo | $59/mo | $149/mo |
| Google Gemini | $9/mo | $59/mo | $149/mo |
| Claude | $29/mo | $109/mo | $439/mo |
What it really costs
- Lite with Gemini and AI Mode: $29 + $9 + $9 = $47/month.
- Lite with all seven engines: $29 + $9 + $9 + $29 = $76/month.
- Standard with Claude and Gemini: $189 + $109 + $59 = $357/month.
- Premium with every add-on: $489 + $149 + $149 + $439 = $1,226/month.
Free trial
Otterly's changelog and FAQ say the free trial is 7 days with no credit card, though some of its signup pages still say 14 days. There's no permanent free plan.
If you only want to know whether Claude, Gemini or Google's AI Mode mention you before paying for add-ons, our Claude visibility checker, Gemini visibility checker and AI Mode checker are free and run in the same scan.
Which engines Otterly tracks, and how often
Seven engines in total: ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity and Microsoft Copilot as standard, with Google AI Mode, Gemini and Claude (added in June 2026) as add-ons. It doesn't track Grok, DeepSeek or Meta AI.
Every prompt runs daily on every engine you pay for. Otterly's help center says the cadence is fixed and the same for all engines. You'll still find reviews that say weekly. That was true at launch, but it's out of date.
According to Otterly, it collects answers from each engine's public interface, the same chat or search screen a buyer sees, rather than the developer API. The exception is Claude, which runs through the API. Interface answers are closer to what real users get, but they still vary with location, session and the day's search results. That's true of every tracker, which is why trends matter more than any single day.
What 15 prompts can (and can't) tell you
The Lite plan's 15 prompts are its biggest limit, and the reviews we read barely discuss what that means for the numbers. Using Otterly's own coverage formula, here's what to expect. These are our calculations, not Otterly's.
- Coverage moves in steps of about 6.7 points. With 15 prompts, one prompt flipping from "mentioned" to "not mentioned" changes your coverage by a fifteenth.
- The uncertainty is wide. If you're named in 6 of 15 prompts (40% coverage), a standard 95% confidence interval runs from roughly 20% to 64%. You can see big moves, but not small ones.
- Daily runs add depth, not breadth. Asking the same 15 prompts every day smooths out day-to-day randomness, but it can't tell you about the buyer questions you didn't pick.
- AI Overviews can shrink the sample. Prompts where Google shows no AI Overview drop out of the AI Overview calculation entirely.
That doesn't make Lite useless. It makes it a trend monitor for a handful of money prompts, not a measurement of your whole market. To get the most from it:
- Spend most prompts on non-branded buyer questions ("best X for Y", "alternatives to [competitor]"), not your own brand name.
- Keep the prompt set unchanged for at least a month, so the trend is comparable.
- Read the answers and citations, not just the coverage line.
- If you need more than 15 prompts, you have to move to Standard, because Lite can't buy extra prompts.
For the general method behind all of this, see how to measure AI visibility.
Integrations: Looker Studio, API, MCP and Semrush
- Looker Studio connector (Standard and above): coverage, mentions, share of voice and position, split by engine and tag. Useful for agencies that report to clients in Looker.
- REST API (Standard and above): read reports, and since mid-2026, create and edit prompts, tags and brand reports.
- MCP server: lets AI assistants such as Claude read your Otterly reports, prompts, citations and audits directly.
- Semrush App Center: a version of Otterly runs inside Semrush without a separate login.
- Agent Analytics connectors: Cloudflare, WordPress, Netlify, webhook or log upload.
We couldn't find official confirmation of Google Analytics, Search Console or CRM integrations, although one review claims them. Ask Otterly before you rely on them.
Pros and cons
We read 14 reviews and comparison pages (most written by competing vendors) plus Otterly's G2 profile. The same points come up again and again.
Pros
- Lowest credible entry price. $29 a month was the most-cited strength, in 9 of 14 sources.
- Easy to set up and read. G2 reviewers rate ease of use and support highly.
- Daily tracking on every plan, with the full answer text behind every number.
- Citations are first-class. Domain and URL reports show exactly which sources shape your category's answers.
- Unlimited team members on every plan, and a partner program for agencies.
- More than tracking: GEO audit, Query Fan-Out, recommendations and AI crawler analytics are included.
Cons
- Only four engines in the base price. Paying extra for Gemini, AI Mode and Claude was the most-cited weakness, in 8 of 14 sources.
- Small prompt allowance on Lite, and no way to add prompts without upgrading.
- Costs climb quickly once you add prompts and engines.
- Monitoring, not execution. It tells you what's wrong; your team still has to fix it.
- Not an SEO suite. No keyword research or Google rank tracking.
- Key features are Standard-only: API, Looker Studio and Agent Analytics.
Who Otterly is (and isn't) for
Bootstrapped and pre-seed startups
Lite at $29 is affordable, but it's only worth paying for once you know AI answers matter for your category and you know which 15 questions to track. If you haven't checked whether ChatGPT or Perplexity mention you at all, do that first. Many early startups find they're absent from every answer, and a tracker will just chart a flat line at zero until you fix that.
Funded SaaS marketing teams
Standard with one or two add-ons ($250–$360 a month) is the realistic setup. You get 100 prompts, the API, Looker Studio and crawler analytics. Compare it with Peec AI before deciding, since the two are the closest mid-market peers.
Agencies
Unlimited workspaces on Standard, the partner program, Looker Studio reports and the Semrush app make Otterly a common agency choice.
Enterprise brands
If you need hundreds of prompts across many markets, plus prompt volume data and dedicated support, Profound is the usual comparison.
A free-first workflow before you pay for tracking
Tracking is only useful once there's something to track. Here's the order we suggest for founders:
- Get a baseline for free. Run a free scan across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode. Our scan is deliberately small (3 buyer prompts and 1 brand prompt), so treat it as a yes-or-no check, not a trend. Are you in the answers at all, and who's named instead?
- Read the cited sources. The pages AI cites for your category are your to-do list. See an example in the sample report.
- Fix the basics. Clear category positioning, comparison pages, and mentions on the sources that matter. Our guide on how to rank in ChatGPT walks through it.
- Re-scan after a few weeks.
- Then subscribe to ongoing tracking: Otterly Lite with the add-ons your buyers use, or join our AI Visibility Tracker waitlist.
If you'd rather have someone build the prompt set and fix plan for you, that's what our done-for-you audit does. It starts with a free strategy call.
Otterly.AI alternatives
| Tool | Best for | Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Peec AI | Mid-market teams and agencies | Prompt tracking with flexible engine choice, unlimited seats |
| Profound | Enterprise brands | Deep analytics, prompt volumes, content agents |
| Ahrefs Brand Radar | Teams already on Ahrefs | A large pre-built prompt index plus custom prompts |
| Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit | Semrush users | AI visibility inside an SEO suite |
| SE Visible (SE Ranking) | Price-conscious teams wanting more engines | Several engines included without per-engine add-ons |
| Our free scan | Founders checking where they stand | One-off scan across 6 AI surfaces, free |
We compare all of them side by side, with prices, in our guide to the best AI visibility tools.
Frequently asked questions
No. There's no free plan, but there is a free trial, which Otterly's changelog says is 7 days with no credit card. Paid plans start at $29 a month.
Lite is $29 a month for 15 prompts, Standard is $189 for 100 prompts, and Premium is $489 for 400 prompts, or roughly 15% less billed annually. Enterprise is custom. Gemini and Google AI Mode add $9 to $149 a month each, and Claude adds $29 to $439 a month, depending on the plan.
ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity and Microsoft Copilot on every plan. Google AI Mode, Gemini and Claude are paid add-ons. It doesn't track Grok, DeepSeek or Meta AI.
Daily, for every engine. The cadence is fixed, so you can't speed it up or slow it down. Older reviews that say weekly are out of date.
Brand Coverage is the share of prompts in the time window whose answers mention your brand (prompts with no Google AI Overview are excluded for that engine). Share of voice is your brand mentions divided by all brand mentions, times 100.
Enough to watch a handful of important buyer questions over time, not enough to measure your whole market. With 15 prompts, each prompt moves coverage by about 6.7 points, so only large changes are meaningful.
Yes. The Looker Studio connector is on Standard and above, and Otterly is available as an app in the Semrush App Center. It also offers a REST API and an MCP server on higher plans.
No. Otter.ai is a meeting transcription app. Otterly.AI is an unrelated company that monitors brand visibility in AI search.
If you just need to know whether AI recommends you, start with a free scan. For ongoing tracking, Peec AI is the closest peer, Ahrefs Brand Radar suits teams already paying for Ahrefs, and Profound suits enterprise budgets.